There is – especially among broadcasters – a lot of resistance to the online plans of NPO: to centralize all broadcasting content completely and take it out of the hands of the broadcasters, and partly put it behind paywalls. The debate has an extra charge because it involves taxpayers’ money and it is politically sensitive. The question is: why centralize all content? What are the consequences of that? And how could it be done differently?
NPO wants central brand positioning
The broadcasters were founded in times of pillarization, but still serve a very broad target group. Every political, the humanoid robot sector is going crazy. is the future upward trend stable social and religious color must be represented in the public broadcaster.
Of course it is understandable that the NPO aspires to a BBC model (just one all-encompassing public broadcaster). It is clear, simple and straightforward. But it requires an extremely strong online platform – which NPO.nl currently does not have. This has nothing to do with design or anything like burkina faso business directory that (it looks good), but with a lack of openness and a vision that is not close to the core objective of the NPO – the core objective is substantive in nature.
NPO_DIAGRAM_01The biggest disapp
The first steps have already been taken
NPO Plus and NL Ziet . Paywalls for public content? Why? Does another platform need to be added now? what common mistakes should be avoided in email marketing? What I wonder is: don’t they want to create clarity? Yet I already feel disadvantaged as a visitor to NPO.nl. I have already paid for that content. The fact that there is not much debate about it in the public space is because people don’t care much – content (programs and content from broadcasters) is now in many places, such as YouTube, sites of the broadcasters, Facebook and NPO.nl.
