Would they consider innocent actions? Google dismissed bloggers who reviewed K-Mart without any questions asked (Note: Google penalized major supermarket chain K-Mart for its pay-per-post). Additionally, Google’s review request form includes Matt Cutts explains how the following text: “Typically, sites that directly benefit from traffic (e.g. SEO sites, affiliate programs, etc.) will be required to provide more evidence of good faith efforts before their site will be reviewed.” Google has decided to use the Matt Cutts above strategies to promote Chrome as follows: Google clearly prioritizes larger company brands in its algorithm and layout (Vince & Panda updates + top of SERPs for some searches suggesting “brand” as filter type).
The more usage data Google collects
The more insane conditions it can impose on small businesses to stay competitive, making them even weaker. If the owner doesn’t have enough time and resources to do SEO, time to Matt Cutts explains how get reviews, time to get local russian phone number citations, Twitter + Facebook + YouTube + Google + time to do a little SEO. ). Google even regulates how small businesses can earn money online. He said in a blog post (mattcutts.com/blog/sponsored-conversations/) that it is no different from selling someone. However, Google Japan has already caused problems with this type of blog posting activity .
Now, Google is doing the same thing again
The fact that people pay to spread this kind of misinformation suggesting that Chrome helps small businesses is like BP buying ads for tours in the Gulf of Mexico. Because we can’t see what isn’t there (unlike a India Whatsapp Number beach with Matt Cutts explains how oil Matt Cutts explains spills), Google’s efforts to destroy small businesses are less obvious in a virtual land, and its PR campaigns are more effective (birds die. Should I follow Google and buy ads on these sites. Still, I don’t have the courage to buy ads on a blog that is under Google’s control.